AInsights Entry for (2S,5S)-theaspirone A (CAS: 24399-19-7)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): Theaspirone A
- IUPAC Name: (2S,5S)-5-ethenyl-2-methyl-2-vinyltetrahydrofuran
- CAS Number: 24399-19-7
- FEMA Number: Not available
- Other Identifiers: Not available
- Molecular Formula: C9H14O
- Molecular Weight: 138.21 g/mol
Theaspirone A is a furan derivative characterized by its tetrahydrofuran ring with ethenyl and methyl substituents. The presence of these functional groups contributes to its unique odor profile, which is significant in flavor and fragrance applications.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
Theaspirone A is known for its distinctive odor profile, often described as having a sweet, fruity aroma with nuances of tea and floral notes. Its intensity is moderate, making it suitable as a background note or modifier in complex formulations. Theaspirone A is typically used to impart a sense of freshness and naturalness in both flavors and fragrances.
Taste and odor thresholds for theaspirone A are not clearly reported in the literature. However, its sensory role is primarily as a modifier, enhancing the overall complexity and realism of the formulation.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
Theaspirone A is not widely reported as a naturally occurring compound in significant quantities. It is primarily synthesized for use in flavor and fragrance applications. The compound can be formed through synthetic pathways involving the cyclization of appropriate precursors under controlled conditions.
Its relevance to "natural flavor" or "natural fragrance" designations is limited due to its synthetic origin, although it may be used in formulations that aim to mimic natural profiles.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
Theaspirone A is utilized in various flavor categories, including fruit, tea, and floral flavors. It serves as a functional modifier, enhancing the authenticity and depth of the flavor profile. Typical use levels in finished food or beverage products are not well-documented, but industry estimates suggest usage in the range of 1-10 ppm, depending on the desired intensity and application.
Stability considerations include moderate resistance to heat and pH variations, although it may be susceptible to oxidation, necessitating careful formulation and storage conditions.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
In fragrance applications, theaspirone A is incorporated into floral and fruity fragrance families. It acts as a modifier, providing trace realism and enhancing the overall bouquet. Typical concentration ranges are qualitative, with usage often at trace levels to achieve the desired effect without overpowering other components.
Theaspirone A contributes primarily to the middle notes of a fragrance, offering moderate volatility that supports its role in creating a balanced olfactory experience.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States: Theaspirone A does not have a specific FEMA GRAS status and is not explicitly listed by the FDA.
- European Union: Not listed under Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008; lacks an FL number.
- United Kingdom: Post-Brexit regulatory alignment with the EU is assumed, but specific listings are not available.
- Asia: Limited information on regulatory status in Japan, China, and ASEAN countries.
- Latin America: Specific regulatory information for Brazil and MERCOSUR is not available.
The regulatory landscape for theaspirone A is characterized by a lack of explicit approvals, with usage often based on harmonized assumptions and industry practices.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: Data on acceptable daily intake (ADI) or margin of safety for theaspirone A is not available. Formulators should proceed with caution, adhering to industry-typical usage levels.
- Dermal Exposure: No specific data on irritation or sensitization; formulators should consider IFRA guidelines for similar compounds.
- Inhalation Exposure: Volatility suggests potential for inhalation exposure, but occupational safety data is limited.
Risk profiles may differ between food and fragrance applications, with fragrance use potentially posing higher dermal exposure risks.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
Theaspirone A is valued for its ability to enhance the naturalness and complexity of both flavors and fragrances. It synergizes well with other fruity and floral notes, providing a subtle yet impactful modification. Common pitfalls include overuse, which can lead to an overpowering effect, and underuse, which may result in a lack of desired complexity.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
Data on theaspirone A is limited, with much reliance on industry-typical practices and undocumented usage levels. Regulatory ambiguities persist, particularly in non-EU regions. Formulators should verify specific regulatory and safety data as part of their due diligence.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1-9 are present
- "Citation hooks:" line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-09-13 05:54:11 GMT (p2)