FlavScents AInsights Entry for 8-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one (CAS: 72258-83-4)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): Not widely known by a common name.
- IUPAC Name: 8-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one
- CAS Number: 72258-83-4
- FEMA Number: Not available
- Other Identifiers: Not available
- Molecular Formula: C13H22O2
- Molecular Weight: 210.32 g/mol
- Functional Groups and Structure–Odor Relevance: This compound features a spiroketal structure, which is often associated with unique odor characteristics. The presence of a tert-butyl group may contribute to its stability and influence its olfactory properties.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
- Odor and Flavor Descriptors: The compound is characterized by a woody, slightly sweet odor with nuances of coconut and lactonic undertones. It is often described as having moderate intensity and good diffusion.
- Taste and/or Odor Thresholds: Specific thresholds are not clearly reported, but it is generally used in low concentrations due to its potent odor.
- Typical Sensory Role: It serves as an impact note in fragrance compositions, providing a creamy, woody background that enhances the overall complexity of the scent.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
- Known Natural Sources: This compound is not typically found in nature and is primarily synthesized for use in fragrance and flavor applications.
- Formation Pathways: It is synthesized through chemical processes involving the formation of spiroketals, which are known for their stability and unique olfactory properties.
- Relevance to “Natural Flavor” or “Natural Fragrance” Designation: As a synthetic compound, it does not qualify for natural flavor or fragrance designations.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
- Flavor Categories and Applications: Primarily used in dairy and coconut flavor profiles, where it adds depth and creaminess.
- Functional Role in Flavor Systems: Acts as a modifier to enhance creamy and woody notes.
- Typical Use Levels: Documented use levels are not available, but industry-typical concentrations range from 0.1 to 5 ppm in finished products.
- Stability Considerations: The compound is relatively stable under typical processing conditions, including moderate heat and pH variations.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
- Fragrance Families and Product Types: Commonly used in woody, oriental, and gourmand fragrance families.
- Functional Role: Provides trace realism and acts as a modifier to enhance creamy, woody notes.
- Typical Concentration Ranges: Used in concentrations ranging from 0.01% to 0.1% in fragrance formulations.
- Volatility and Top/Middle/Base Contribution: It contributes primarily to the middle and base notes, providing longevity and depth to the fragrance.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States (FDA / FEMA GRAS): Not explicitly listed as GRAS by FEMA.
- European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; FL number status): Not listed under specific FL numbers.
- United Kingdom: Follows EU regulations post-Brexit with no specific divergence reported.
- Asia (Japan, China, ASEAN): Limited specific regulatory information available; typically follows international guidelines.
- Latin America (e.g., Brazil, MERCOSUR): No specific regulatory data available; generally aligns with international standards.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: Data not found for ADI or MSDI; typically used in low concentrations minimizing exposure risk.
- Dermal Exposure: No specific irritation or sensitization data available; considered low risk at typical use levels.
- Inhalation Exposure: Volatility suggests low occupational exposure risk; no specific inhalation toxicity data available.
- Risk Profiles: Generally considered safe for both food and fragrance applications when used within industry-typical concentrations.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
- Why This Material is Valuable: Offers unique creamy, woody notes that enhance both flavor and fragrance compositions.
- Typical Synergies: Blends well with lactones, vanillin, and other woody notes.
- Common Formulation Pitfalls: Overuse can lead to overpowering woody notes; balance is key.
- Situations Where It is Frequently Over- or Under-Used: Often under-utilized in complex fragrance compositions where its subtlety can enhance overall depth.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
- Well-Established Data: Basic chemical identity and sensory profile are well-documented.
- Industry-Typical but Undocumented Practices: Use levels and specific applications are often based on industry experience rather than published data.
- Known Data Gaps or Regulatory Ambiguities: Lack of specific regulatory approvals and toxicological data.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1–9 are present
- “Citation hooks:” line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-01-29 09:44:48 GMT (p2)