The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material, specifically diethyl malate, for a platform called FlavScents.com. This prompt is designed for use by a technical research assistant and is structured to ensure that all relevant aspects of the material are covered in depth. Here's a breakdown of the key components and requirements:
Key Components of the Prompt:
-
Material Information: The prompt is focused on a single compound, diethyl malate, with a specific CAS number provided.
-
Source Priority: The prompt emphasizes using FlavScents as the primary reference, supplemented by authoritative external sources like FEMA, EFSA, IFRA, and others.
-
Material Type Handling: Instructions are given for handling both single compounds and complex natural materials, with specific guidelines for each.
-
Depth Requirement: The prompt enforces a detailed exploration of each section, with word count targets and instructions on handling missing data.
-
Output Format: The entry must follow a specific format with numbered headings and include citation hooks for each section.
Sections to be Included:
-
Identity & Chemical Information: Details about the compound's identity, including common names, IUPAC name, CAS number, and other identifiers.
-
Sensory Profile: Description of the material's odor and flavor characteristics, including thresholds and sensory roles.
-
Natural Occurrence & Formation: Information on natural sources and formation pathways, and relevance to natural designations.
-
Use in Flavors: Discussion of flavor applications, functional roles, typical use levels, and stability considerations.
-
Use in Fragrances: Description of fragrance applications, functional roles, concentration ranges, and volatility.
-
Key Constituents (Typical): Only for complex natural materials, listing major constituents and noting variability.
-
Regulatory Status (Regional Overview): Overview of regulatory treatment in various regions, including explicit approvals and known uncertainties.
-
Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations: Safety discussion for oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure routes.
-
Practical Insights for Formulators: Expert insights on the material's value, synergies, pitfalls, and usage trends.
-
Confidence & Data Quality Notes: Summary of data quality, industry practices, and known gaps.
-
QA Check: A checklist to ensure all sections are present and requirements are met.
Quality Assurance:
- The prompt includes a QA section to verify that all required sections are included, citation hooks are present, and specific requirements for flavor, toxicology, and regulatory sections are met.
Style & Constraints:
- The writing should be targeted at experienced professionals, avoiding marketing language and focusing on interpretive insights.
This structured approach ensures that the entry is comprehensive, technically accurate, and relevant for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry.
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-01-23 20:16:40 GMT (p2)