The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material on FlavScents.com. This prompt is designed for a technical research assistant and emphasizes the importance of clarity, accuracy, and relevance in the context of flavor and fragrance formulation. Here’s a breakdown of the key components and requirements:
Overview
- Material Focus: The prompt is tailored for a single chemical compound, specifically (E)-2-(2,4-hexadiynylidene)-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-ene (CAS: 3306-40-9).
- Audience: The content is intended for experienced professionals such as flavor chemists, perfumers, product developers, toxicologists, and regulatory specialists.
- Source Priority: Emphasizes using authoritative sources like FlavScents, FEMA, EFSA, IFRA, PubChem, and others, while avoiding direct reliance on GoodScents.
Structure and Content Requirements
-
Identity & Chemical Information:
- Includes common names, IUPAC name, CAS number, FEMA number, molecular formula, and weight.
- Discusses functional groups and structure-odor relevance.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, PubChem, FEMA.
-
Sensory Profile:
- Describes odor and flavor descriptors, thresholds, and sensory roles.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, peer-reviewed sensory literature.
-
Natural Occurrence & Formation:
- Details natural sources, formation pathways, and relevance to natural designations.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, food chemistry literature, EFSA, JECFA.
-
Use in Flavors:
- Covers flavor categories, functional roles, typical use levels, and stability considerations.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, FEMA, formulation literature.
-
Use in Fragrances:
- Discusses fragrance families, functional roles, concentration ranges, and volatility.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, IFRA, fragrance chemistry texts.
-
Regulatory Status (Regional Overview):
- Summarizes regulatory treatment in various regions, distinguishing approvals and uncertainties.
- Citation Hooks: FEMA, EFSA, national authorities.
-
Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations:
- Addresses safety in oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure contexts.
- Citation Hooks: EFSA, FEMA, PubChem, toxicology literature.
-
Practical Insights for Formulators:
- Provides insights on material value, synergies, pitfalls, and usage trends.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, industry practice.
-
Confidence & Data Quality Notes:
- Summarizes data quality, industry practices, and known gaps.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents.
-
QA Check:
- Ensures all sections are present, citation hooks are included, and specific requirements are met.
Style & Constraints
- Word Count: Targets 900-1400 words for single-compound materials.
- Section Depth: Each section should be 120-220 words unless evidence is limited.
- Data Integrity: Avoids fabricating numeric values and emphasizes interpretive insights over repetition.
This structured approach ensures that the entry is comprehensive, technically accurate, and useful for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry.
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-01-27 02:09:35 GMT (p2)