AInsights Entry for Ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (CAS: 3025-30-7)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): Ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate
- IUPAC Name: Ethyl (2E,4Z)-deca-2,4-dienoate
- CAS Number: 3025-30-7
- FEMA Number: 2391
- Other Identifiers: FL No. 09.034
- Molecular Formula: C12H20O2
- Molecular Weight: 196.29 g/mol
- Functional Groups and Structure–Odor Relevance: This compound contains ester functional groups, which are often associated with fruity and floral odors. The conjugated diene system contributes to its characteristic aroma profile, enhancing its volatility and diffusion properties.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
- Odor and Flavor Descriptors: Ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate is known for its strong, fruity aroma reminiscent of pear and apple. It is often described as having a sweet, ripe, and juicy character with a hint of tropical fruit nuances.
- Taste and/or Odor Thresholds: The odor threshold is typically low, allowing it to be perceived at minimal concentrations, although specific threshold values are not clearly reported.
- Typical Sensory Role: It serves as an impact note in flavor compositions, providing a distinct fruity character that enhances the overall profile of the formulation.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
- Known Natural Sources: Ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate is naturally found in various fruits, including apples and pears, contributing to their characteristic aroma.
- Formation Pathways: It is formed through enzymatic reactions during the ripening of fruits, where esterification processes convert fatty acids and alcohols into esters.
- Relevance to “Natural Flavor” or “Natural Fragrance” Designation: Due to its natural occurrence in fruits, it can be labeled as a natural flavor or fragrance component when derived from natural sources.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
- Flavor Categories and Applications: Commonly used in fruit-flavored products, including beverages, candies, and baked goods, to impart a fresh, fruity aroma.
- Functional Role in Flavor Systems: Acts as a primary impact note, enhancing the fruitiness and sweetness of the flavor profile.
- Typical Use Levels: Documented use levels range from 0.1 to 5 ppm in finished products, with typical industry use around 1 ppm.
- Stability Considerations: It is relatively stable under normal conditions but can degrade under high heat or acidic conditions, which may alter its sensory characteristics.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
- Fragrance Families and Product Types: Utilized in fruity and floral fragrance compositions, often in personal care products like lotions and perfumes.
- Functional Role: Provides a fresh, fruity top note that enhances the overall fragrance profile.
- Typical Concentration Ranges: Used at concentrations ranging from 0.01% to 0.1% in fragrance formulations.
- Volatility and Top/Middle/Base Contribution: Primarily contributes to the top note due to its high volatility and diffusion properties.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States (FDA / FEMA GRAS): Recognized as GRAS for flavor use by FEMA.
- European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; FL Number Status): Approved for use as a flavoring substance.
- United Kingdom (Post-Brexit Alignment or Divergence): Follows EU regulations; no significant divergence reported.
- Asia (Japan, China, ASEAN): Generally permitted in flavor applications, but specific regulations may vary.
- Latin America (e.g., Brazil, MERCOSUR): Accepted for use in flavors, with adherence to local regulatory frameworks.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: Considered safe for use in food products at typical concentrations, with no specific ADI established.
- Dermal Exposure: Generally regarded as non-irritating and non-sensitizing at typical fragrance concentrations.
- Inhalation Exposure: Low volatility reduces inhalation risks, but occupational exposure should be managed with standard safety practices.
- Risk Profiles: No significant differences in risk profiles between food and fragrance applications.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
- Why This Material is Valuable: Its strong, fruity aroma makes it a versatile component in both flavor and fragrance formulations.
- Typical Synergies: Pairs well with other fruity esters and aldehydes to enhance complexity and depth.
- Common Formulation Pitfalls: Overuse can lead to an overpowering aroma; balance is key.
- Situations Where It is Frequently Over- or Under-Used: Often under-utilized in complex formulations where subtlety is required.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
- Well-Established Data: Comprehensive sensory and regulatory data available.
- Industry-Typical but Undocumented Practices: Use levels and synergies often based on industry experience.
- Known Data Gaps or Regulatory Ambiguities: Specific toxicological thresholds not well-documented.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1–9 are present
- “Citation hooks:” line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-06-08 15:53:25 GMT (p2)