AInsights Entry for (-)-Epigallocatechin-4'-O-methylether (CAS: 17291-05-3)
1. Identity & Chemical Information
- Common Name(s): (-)-Epigallocatechin-4'-O-methylether
- IUPAC Name: (2R,3R)-2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-1(2H)-benzopyran-3,5,7-triol 4'-methylether
- CAS Number: 17291-05-3
- FEMA Number: Not applicable
- Other Identifiers: Not available
- Molecular Formula: C16H16O7
- Molecular Weight: 320.29 g/mol
- Functional Groups and Structure-Odor Relevance: This compound contains multiple hydroxyl groups and an ether linkage, which are characteristic of flavonoids. These functional groups contribute to its antioxidant properties and potential impact on flavor profiles, although it is not primarily used for its odor.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; PubChem; FEMA
2. Sensory Profile
- Odor and Flavor Descriptors: (-)-Epigallocatechin-4'-O-methylether is not typically characterized by a distinct odor. Its flavor profile is subtle, contributing astringency and bitterness, which are common in catechins.
- Taste and/or Odor Thresholds: Data not found. Generally, catechins have low sensory thresholds due to their astringent nature.
- Typical Sensory Role: It serves as a background modifier, enhancing the complexity of flavor systems, particularly in tea and related beverages.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; peer-reviewed sensory literature
3. Natural Occurrence & Formation
- Known Natural Sources: This compound is primarily found in green tea leaves and other Camellia sinensis derivatives.
- Formation Pathways: It is biosynthesized in plants through the flavonoid pathway, involving the enzymatic methylation of epigallocatechin.
- Relevance to “Natural Flavor” or “Natural Fragrance” Designation: As a naturally occurring compound in tea, it qualifies for use in natural flavor formulations.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; food chemistry literature; EFSA/JECFA monographs
4. Use in Flavors
- Flavor Categories and Applications: Predominantly used in tea flavorings and health-related beverage formulations.
- Functional Role in Flavor Systems: Acts as a flavor enhancer and astringency contributor.
- Typical Use Levels: Documented use levels are not clearly reported. Industry-typical estimates suggest low ppm levels due to its potent astringency.
- Stability Considerations: It is relatively stable under acidic conditions but can degrade under high heat and alkaline conditions.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; FEMA GRAS documentation; formulation literature
5. Use in Fragrances
- Fragrance Families and Product Types: Not commonly used in fragrance formulations due to its lack of a distinct odor profile.
- Functional Role: If used, it would be for trace realism or as a modifier in complex formulations.
- Typical Concentration Ranges: Not applicable.
- Volatility and Top/Middle/Base Contribution: Not applicable.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; IFRA; fragrance chemistry texts
6. Regulatory Status (Regional Overview)
- United States (FDA / FEMA GRAS): Not specifically listed as GRAS.
- European Union (Reg. (EC) No 1334/2008; FL number status): Not explicitly listed.
- United Kingdom (post-Brexit alignment or divergence): Follows EU regulations.
- Asia (Japan, China, ASEAN): Generally recognized as safe in traditional tea products.
- Latin America (e.g., Brazil, MERCOSUR): No specific regulations identified.
Citation hooks: FEMA; EFSA; national authority publications
7. Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations
- Oral Exposure: Generally considered safe at levels found in traditional tea consumption. No specific ADI or MSDI established.
- Dermal Exposure: Not typically relevant due to its primary use in flavors.
- Inhalation Exposure: Not applicable.
- Risk Profiles: No significant differences between food and fragrance applications due to limited use in fragrances.
Citation hooks: EFSA; FEMA; PubChem; toxicology literature
8. Practical Insights for Formulators
- Why This Material is Valuable: Its antioxidant properties and contribution to astringency make it valuable in health-focused beverages.
- Typical Synergies: Works well with other catechins and polyphenols to enhance health benefits.
- Common Formulation Pitfalls: Overuse can lead to excessive bitterness and astringency.
- Situations Where It is Frequently Over- or Under-used: Often under-used in non-tea applications due to its strong astringency.
Citation hooks: FlavScents; industry practice
9. Confidence & Data Quality Notes
- Well-Established Data: Natural occurrence and basic chemical properties are well-documented.
- Industry-Typical but Undocumented Practices: Use levels in formulations are often based on traditional practices rather than documented studies.
- Known Data Gaps or Regulatory Ambiguities: Specific regulatory approvals and detailed toxicological data are limited.
Citation hooks: FlavScents
QA Check
- All required sections 1–9 are present
- “Citation hooks:” line is present under each section
- Flavor section includes ppm ranges
- Toxicology section covers oral, dermal, inhalation
- Regulatory section mentions US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America
- If complex natural material: includes section 5a (not applicable here)
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-04-23 06:58:39 GMT (p2)