The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material, specifically (E)-citral (CAS: 141-27-5), for FlavScents.com. The prompt is designed for a technical research assistant and emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and relevance to formulation and safety contexts. Here’s a breakdown of the key components and requirements:
Prompt Overview
- Purpose: To create a technically accurate and comprehensive entry for a specific flavor and fragrance material.
- Audience: Experienced professionals such as flavor chemists, perfumers, product developers, toxicologists, and regulatory specialists.
- Material Type: Single compound (E)-citral.
Key Sections and Requirements
-
Identity & Chemical Information:
- Include common names, IUPAC name, CAS number, FEMA number, molecular formula, and molecular weight.
- Discuss functional groups and structure-odor relevance.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, PubChem, FEMA.
-
Sensory Profile:
- Describe odor and flavor descriptors, taste and/or odor thresholds, and typical sensory roles.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, peer-reviewed sensory literature.
-
Natural Occurrence & Formation:
- Detail known natural sources, formation pathways, and relevance to "natural flavor" or "natural fragrance" designation.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, food chemistry literature, EFSA, JECFA.
-
Use in Flavors:
- Discuss flavor categories, functional roles, typical use levels (ppm), and stability considerations.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, FEMA, formulation literature.
-
Use in Fragrances:
- Describe fragrance families, functional roles, concentration ranges, and volatility.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, IFRA, fragrance chemistry texts.
-
Regulatory Status (Regional Overview):
- Summarize regulatory treatment in various regions (US, EU, UK, Asia, Latin America).
- Citation Hooks: FEMA, EFSA, national authorities.
-
Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations:
- Discuss safety in terms of oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure.
- Citation Hooks: EFSA, FEMA, PubChem, toxicology literature.
-
Practical Insights for Formulators:
- Provide insights on material value, synergies, formulation pitfalls, and usage trends.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents, industry practice.
-
Confidence & Data Quality Notes:
- Summarize data quality, industry practices, and known data gaps.
- Citation Hooks: FlavScents.
-
QA Check:
- Confirm all sections are present, citation hooks are included, and specific requirements are met.
Additional Guidelines
- Depth Requirement: Each section should be substantive, with a target length of 120-220 words.
- Data Handling: Do not fabricate numeric values; state "Data not found" if necessary.
- Output Format: Use markdown with numbered headings.
- Quality Assurance: Ensure all sections and requirements are fulfilled before finalizing the entry.
This structured approach ensures that the entry is thorough, well-researched, and useful for professionals in the flavor and fragrance industry.
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-01-19 19:18:10 GMT (p2)