The provided JSON configuration outlines a detailed prompt for generating a comprehensive entry for a flavor and fragrance material, specifically (E)-isoeugenol, for FlavScents.com. This prompt is designed for a technical research assistant and emphasizes clarity, accuracy, and relevance to formulation and safety contexts. Here’s a breakdown of the key components and requirements:
Key Components:
-
Material Type Handling:
- The prompt distinguishes between single chemical compounds and complex natural materials, providing specific instructions for each type.
- For single compounds like (E)-isoeugenol, detailed chemical information is required.
-
Depth Requirement:
- Each section must be substantively filled, with a target word count for single compounds (~900–1400 words) and complex materials (~1100–1700 words).
- Missing data should be acknowledged with explanations or best-practice guidance.
-
Output Format:
- The output should be structured with numbered headings and include a "Citation hooks:" line for each section, indicating sources to consult.
Sections and Requirements:
-
Identity & Chemical Information:
- Includes common names, IUPAC name, CAS number, and other identifiers.
- Discusses functional groups and structure-odor relevance.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, PubChem, FEMA.
-
Sensory Profile:
- Describes odor and flavor descriptors, thresholds, and sensory roles.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, peer-reviewed sensory literature.
-
Natural Occurrence & Formation:
- Lists natural sources and formation pathways.
- Discusses relevance to "natural flavor" or "natural fragrance" designations.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, food chemistry literature, EFSA, JECFA.
-
Use in Flavors:
- Details flavor categories, applications, and typical use levels in ppm.
- Discusses stability considerations.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, FEMA, formulation literature.
-
Use in Fragrances:
- Describes fragrance families, functional roles, and concentration ranges.
- Discusses volatility and contribution to fragrance notes.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, IFRA, fragrance chemistry texts.
-
Regulatory Status (Regional Overview):
- Summarizes regulatory treatment in various regions, including the US, EU, UK, Asia, and Latin America.
- Distinguishes between approvals, assumptions, and uncertainties.
- Citation hooks: FEMA, EFSA, national authorities.
-
Toxicology, Safety & Exposure Considerations:
- Discusses safety in the context of oral, dermal, and inhalation exposure.
- Addresses risk profiles for food and fragrance applications.
- Citation hooks: EFSA, FEMA, PubChem, toxicology literature.
-
Practical Insights for Formulators:
- Provides expert insights on the material's value, synergies, and common pitfalls.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents, industry practice.
-
Confidence & Data Quality Notes:
- Summarizes well-established data, industry practices, and data gaps.
- Citation hooks: FlavScents.
-
QA Check:
- A checklist confirming the presence of all required sections and citation hooks.
- Ensures compliance with specific requirements for flavor, toxicology, and regulatory sections.
Style & Constraints:
- The writing should be for experienced professionals, avoiding marketing language and focusing on interpretive insights.
This configuration ensures a thorough and structured approach to documenting flavor and fragrance materials, with a strong emphasis on technical accuracy and practical relevance.
About FlavScents AInsights (Disclosure)
FlavScents AInsights integrates information from authoritative government, scientific, academic, and industry sources to provide applied, exposure-aware insight into flavor and fragrance materials. Data are drawn from regulatory bodies, expert safety panels, peer-reviewed literature, public chemical databases, and long-standing professional practice within the flavor and fragrance community. Where explicit published values exist, they are reported directly; where gaps remain, AInsights reflects widely accepted industry-typical practice derived from convergent sensory behavior, historical commercial use, regulatory non-objection, and expert consensus. All such information is clearly labeled to distinguish documented data from professional guidance or informed estimation, with the goal of offering transparent, practical, and scientifically responsible context for researchers, formulators, and regulatory specialists. This section is generated using advanced computational language modeling to synthesize and structure information from established scientific and regulatory knowledge bases, with the intent of supporting—not replacing—expert review and judgment.
Generated 2026-01-27 15:00:15 GMT (p2)
